Friday, March 28, 2003 - 11:11 AM
2834

Management of the “Black Hole” in Refractory VPI: Combined Use of the Furlow Palatoplasty and Sphincter Pharyngoplasty

Firas R. Karmo, MD, Arun K. Gosain, M.D., and Peddireddi V. Sudhakar, M.S., M.Ch.

The efficacy of the pharyngeal flap for treatment of refractory velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is questionable. The present series reviews patients with refractory VPI who were managed with a combined Furlow palatoplasty (FP) and a sphincter pharyngoplasty (SPP). Methods: All patients underwent a preoperative evaluation consisting of 1) perceptual speech assessment (scale 1 to 12); 2) nasendoscopy; 3) videofluoroscopy. Patients were categorized as Group 1 ("Black Hole") if lateral wall motion were graded as 1 to 2 over 5 and/or their velopharyngeal gap were 7mm or greater. Patients who had failed pharyngeal flaps were categorized as Group 2. Results: Thirteen patients were included in the study. The degree of lateral wall motion was 1 to 2 in 10 patients. The VP gap on phonation was greater than 7 mm in 7 of 10 patients. in Group 1, and 3-7 mm in Group 2. Mean nasality ratings were 10.2 preoperatively, and 1.8 following FP and SPP (p<.001). Conclusions: The FP alone has been shown to be inadequate to correct severe cases of VPI in which there is a large velopharyngeal gap with minimal lateral wall motion. The addition of a SPP is an effective adjunct to the sphincteric design of the FP.