Sunday, October 8, 2006
10510

Management of the Contaminated Graft in Aesthetic Surgery

Ankit R. Desai, MD and Robert F. Centeno, MD.

Purpose: To begin documenting the prevalence and appropriate management of contaminated autologous grafts in aesthetic plastic surgery.

Methods: An online survey was sent to American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery members to investigate the incidence of autograft contamination, treatment preferences, clinical outcomes, and patient disclosure.

Results: 121 anonymous responses were received, with 67% reporting autograft contamination. Twenty-four percent of surgeons reported 1 incidence, 37% cited 2, 17% experienced 3, and 21% reported 4 or more. Ninety-four percent of contaminated grafts were managed with decontamination and surgery completion. Ten percent of surgeons harvested an alternative graft and 3.6% used an alloplastic substitute. The most common decontamination method was antibiotic solution (57%), followed by povidone-iodine (49%) and bulb saline irrigation (43%). Two patients experienced a wound infection associated with a contaminated graft. In 62.4% of cases, the contamination was not disclosed to the patient.

Discussion: After evaluating survey results and existing literature, an algorithm for tissue-specific decontamination techniques was developed. Also discussed are the medical and ethical dilemmas associated with patient disclosure and proposed solutions.

Conclusion: Autologous graft contamination is common in aesthetic plastic surgery and managed with decontamination in the majority of instances. Contamination causes minimal or no deleterious clinical sequelae.
View Synopsis (.doc format, 54.0 kb)