Thursday, March 23, 2006
9812

Comparison of Acticoat TM, AllevynTM, and XeroformTM as a Donor Site Dressing in a Rodent Model

Marc Bisseck, MD, Puya Davoodi, MD, and John H. Robinson, MD.

Re-epithelialization of split-thickness skin graft donor sites continues to pose a challenge to plastic surgeons. Rakel et al. in an extensive donor site dressing review concluded that moist healing environment provided optimal healing times. The purpose of this study is to compare re-epithelialization rates of ActicoatTM and AllevynTM to a known standard XeroformTM. In a population of rats, three split-thickness skin grafts were taken from the back of each male rat (n=17). The three wounds were covered with ActicoatTM, AllevynTM, and XeroformTM on each rat. On post-operative days three and six the ActicoatTM and AllevynTM dressings were removed, new dressing placed, and digital photographs of the wounds taken. The photographs were shown to three experienced plastic surgeons, and the degree of wound healing was evaluated for each rat at each donor site. Epithelialization was the measured end-point. The XeroformTM dressed wounds epithelialized more rapidly. Cost comparisons were also included in this study.