Thursday, February 1, 2007
12092

Two Year Review of Tertiary Breast Reconstruction

Mary Lester, MD and Robert J. Allen, MD.

Purpose Statement

With the advent of perforator flaps, breast reconstruction options now include DIEP, S-GAP, and I-GAP flaps. However, implant reconstruction was utilized in approximately 80% of 57,778 reconstruction cases in 2005. Many patients present with complaints of inferior aesthetic results and pain. These implant failures or tertiary reconstructions account for 26% of cases done over a two year period.

Methods and Materials

All flaps performed by the senior surgeon were reviewed over a two year period. Three hundred and fifty-five flaps were performed during that period with 91 flaps being tertiary reconstructions. A chart review was performed comparing these patient populations.

Summary of Results/Conclusions

Approximately 70% of tertiary reconstructions were performed with abdominal perforator flaps and 30% with gluteal perforator flaps. Patient Timing of tertiary reconstruction varies between several months to several years, and 12% of patients had undergone radiation therapy. After tertiary reconstruction patients had improved pain and cosmetic results, as well as improved self confidence.