Saturday, October 24, 2009 - 10:05 AM
16688

BMP-2 within CAD/Cam Customized Bilaminar Resorbable Mesh Promote Cranial Defect Bone Healing

James P. Bradley, MD, Henry Kawamoto, Jr, MD, Calvin Yang, MD, PhD, and Hurig Katchikian, BS.

Purpose: For repair of cranial vault defects, alloplastic (titanium or methylmethacrylate) solutions may result in nonhealing or infectious complications and autogenous solutions (split rib or calvaria) may result in excessive blood loss or donor site morbidity.  As a new option for this reconstructive challenge, we investigated a method using a bilaminar resorbable construct with BMP-2 with hopes of providing initial structural support followed by bone healing without permanent foreign body problems.  Prior to our clinical work, we studied the bony healing in an animal model. Our objective was to characterize animal cranial defect healing with bone tissue engineering options and compare this new method with other clinical cases.

Methods: Part I: Surgically created large cranial defects in 40 day old Sprague Dawley rats were treated with 1) BMP-2 on a resorbable matrix within bilaminar resorbable plates, 2) regular ASCs seeded in collagen within bilaminar resorbable plates, 3) bilaminar resorbable plates only or 4) nothing (control) (n=30). The impact and fracture stability of the resorbable construct was studied. For bone healing: histology and microCT scans were analyzed at 4, 8, 12 weeks. Part II: Clinical patients with moderate to large cranial vault defects who underwent reconstruction from 2000-2007 were studied with CT scans in perioperative and follow-up (>6 months) (n=69).  New method of BMP-2 in collagen sandwiched in a bilaminar resorbable construct fashioned from a CAD/CAM patient specific negative was compared to other methods.

Results: Part I: The stability of bilaminar resorbable constructs was less than bone but greater than mesh alone.  Rat cranial vault defects healed 85% faster and with 24% more final bone fill with BMP-2 in the bilaminar constructs than the regular ASCs or construct only groups and had 55% more bone fill compared to the nothing (control) group. Part II: Clinical cranial defect reconstruction included 1)titanium mesh plate=11, cryopreserved bone flap=18, 3)patient specific alloplast=13, 4)split autogenous bone=19 and 5)new method of BMP-2 in bilaminar resorbable construct=8. Perioperative data showed higher complications with titanium mesh, frozen bone and alloplast with regard to infection and/or exposure (36%, 22% and 23% compared to autogenous= 5%, BMP/bilaminar construct= 14%).  Bone healing was superior in the BMP/bilaminar construct and autogenous bone groups with complete bone healing in 85%  and 90% compared to the others (frozen bone=18%, others=minimal healing).

Conclusions: 1) BMP-2 within a bilaminar construct augmented bone healing of animal cranial defects; 2) a new method of treatment of large clinical cranial defects with BMP/bilaminar resorbable constructs provided improved bone healing with less infectious/exposure related problems over alloplastic options. This study documents our group’s early experience with cranial vault defect healing using a bone tissue engineering approach that allows for initial sturctural stability followed by bone healing without residual foreign body.