17883 Controlled Neurotrophic Factor Delivery to Promote Functional Peripheral Nerve Regeneration

Sunday, October 3, 2010: 9:40 AM
Metro Toronto Convention Centre
Matthew D. Wood, PhD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
Matthew R. MacEwan, MSc , Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO
Alexander R. French, BSc , Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO
Amy M. Moore, MD , Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Daniel A. Hunter, RA , Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Susan E. Mackinnon, MD , Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Daniel W. Moran, PhD , Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO
Shelly E. Sakiyama-Elbert, PhD , Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO
Gregory H. Borschel, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children / University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Purpose:

Despite advances in the treatment of peripheral nerve injury, functional recovery is often suboptimal.  Alternatives to current treatments (autografts) have included nerve guidance conduits.  Glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is the most potent motor growth factor to date and may enhance regenerating motor axons.  Therefore, the delivery of this growth factor from a nerve guidance conduit may enhance motor nerve regeneration and functional recovery.  We chose to investigate the use of an affinity-based delivery system (DS) constructed in fibrin (Figure 1) to provide controlled local delivery of growth factor to the injury site to enhance motor nerve regeneration.

Methods:

We evaluated the effect of controlled delivery of GDNF from fibrin-filled nerve guidance conduits on motor nerve regeneration and functional recovery in a 13 mm rat sciatic nerve defect.  Seven experimental groups were evaluated including: GDNF and DS and NGF with DS and control groups including: GDNF without a DS, isograft (positive control), fibrin with growth factors and empty conduits.  Animals were monitored monthly for behavioral recovery, which included sciatic functional index and grid-grip abilities, and analyzed after 12 weeks for muscle contractile force assessment and retrograde labeling of motor neurons.

Results:

Groups with growth factor in the nerve guidance conduit performed similar to or better (GDNF) than the isograft in behavioral tests and had similar spared relative muscle mass (53 – 63%).  Additionally, groups with controlled GDNF delivery had greater extensor digitorum longus contractile force than the isograft (56% compared to 25%, normalized to uninjured muscle).  Motor regeneration assessed by retrograde labeling revealed that controlled GDNF delivery matched the isograft in the number of regenerating normalized ventral horn neurons (~60%) (Figure 2).

Conclusion:

Overall, the controlled delivery of GDNF from a nerve guidance conduit demonstrated improved measures of functional recovery, suggesting GDNF has potential as a treatment for motor nerve injury.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of surgical implantation of nerve guidance conduit containing the affinity-based delivery system (DS) (modified from Wood et al.).

Figure 2 Normalized ventral horn neurons retrograde labeled 12 weeks after injury.

References:

  1. Wood MD, Moore AM, Hunter DA, Tuffaha S, Borschel GH, Mackinnon SE, and Sakiyama-Elbert SE. Affinity-based release of glial-derived neurotrophic factor from fibrin matrices enhances sciatic nerve regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia 5:959-968, 2009.