18879 The Use of Seprafilm as a Biological Barrier in Flap Delay

Sunday, September 25, 2011: 11:00 AM
Colorado Convention Center
Andrew L. Blount, MD , Plastic Surgery, Grand Rapids Medical Education Partners/Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI
Adam K. Boettcher, MD , Plastic Surgery, Grand Rapids Medical Education Partners/Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI
Andrea Van-Pelt, MD , Plastic Surgery, Center for Breast and Body Contouring, Grand Rapids, MI
Kerby C. Oberg, MD , Divisions of Human Anatomy and Pediatric Pathology, Department of Pathology and Human Anatomy, Loma Linda University and Medical School, Loma Linda, CA
Ewa Komorowska-Timek, MD , Plastic Surgery, Center for Breast and Body Contouring, Grand Rapids, MI

Purpose:

Seprafilm is a bioresorbable hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose membrane used to prevent fibrosis and adhesion formation in abdominal and pelvic surgery. The clinical efficacy of Seprafilm has been attributed to its properties as a non-immunologic barrier, though its mechanism of action is not fully understood. We experimentally investigated the role of Seprafilm in ameliorating reactive fibrosis around a rat implant and postulated that Seprafilm may reduce adhesions under surgically delayed flaps 

Methods:

Two 4x3 cm non-communicating pockets were created on the back of eight Spraque-Dawley rats.  A saline-filled smooth 5 ml implant was positioned in each pocket. The right-sided implant was wrapped with 3.5cm x 7cm sheet of Seprafilm, with the left-sided, unwrapped implant serving as control. Animals were sacrificed at 3 weeks. The periprosthetic capsules were sent for microscopic analysis including capsular thickness and extent of inflammatory infiltrate.  Clinically, Seprafilm was utilized as a barrier to adhesion formation in two patients undergoing surgical delay of reverse sural and trapezius myocutaneous flaps. After 3 weeks, each flap’s undersurface and viability were evaluated. 

Results:

Seprafilm wrapping of implants resulted in decrease in minimum (46±47μm vs 189±121μm; p = 0.01) and maximum (241±173μm vs 461±207μm; p = 0.03) thickness of periprosthetic capsules, with areas of non-detectable cellular capsule observed in 3 animals.  Four animals (50%) developed distinctly loose periprosthetic capsules with Seprafilm, which was never observed on the control side. Seprafilm did not affect the degree of inflammation. Clinically, no signs of excessive inflammation or infection were observed in either of the patients. The undersurface of each flap displayed no signs of healing and thus no redissection was required. The Seprafilm had resorbed with no detectable evidence of residual product. Both flaps were fully viable postoperatively.  

Conclusion:

Seprafilm decreased periprosthetic capsular thickness in the rat model without undue inflammation. Clinically, the application of Seprafilm resulted in no adhesion formation between the delayed flap and surrounding tissues, which facilitated reoperation. We speculate that Seprafilm serves as a barrier to fibrotic healing, and thereby may enhance the development of preferential blood supply of a delayed flap.