19086 Simultaneous Mastopexy in Patients Undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction

Sunday, September 25, 2011: 10:35 AM
Colorado Convention Center
Faisal M. Al-Mufarrej, MB, BCh , Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
John E. Woods, MD, PhD , Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Steven R. Jacobson, MD , Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

INTRODUCTION: Although still controversial, there is a renewed interest in preserving the nipple-areolar complex in patients undergoing prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomies.  The aesthetic result of immediate reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy is excellent in select patients.  In some patients, however, a satisfactory aesthetic result may be limited by breast ptosis that goes uncorrected in the early phase of reconstruction.  Most plastic surgeons remain hesitant to perform a mastopexy at the time of a nipple-sparing mastectomy due to concerns with nipple and/or skin flap loss.  We present a single-surgeon experience with nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant reconstruction with simultaneous mastopexy.  METHODS: From 1975-2009, 2013 patients underwent nipple-preserving mastectomy at Mayo Clinic.  33 female patients who underwent bilateral nipple sparing mastectomy with mastopexy and immediate implant-based reconstruction were identified and retrospectively reviewed.  RESULTS: Of the 66 mastopexies performed, 18 (27.3%) were donut, and 48 (72.7%) were vertical pedicle.  The indications for risk reduction surgery included family history (66.7%), mastodynia (57.6%), and LCIS (6%).  Two patients (6%) had invasive ductal cancer, and one patient had chronic mastitis due to siliconomas.  Wound complications occurred in six patients (18.2%) and seven breasts (10.6%).  Only one patient (3% of patients/breasts) developed bilateral total nipple loss.  Four patients, who underwent vertical pedicle mastopexies, developed unilateral, superficial areolar loss that resolved with conservative treatment.  Of the 18 patients who underwent donut mastopexies, only one developed unilateral, isolated partial ischemia of the mastectomy flap that resolved with local wound care.  Partial skin and areolar loss did not delay tissue expansion in any of the patients. There was no correlation between preoperative breast size and postoperative complications. None of the patients developed breast cancer. Average follow-up was 12.3 (0.2-20) years. CONCLUSION: With proper technique, a simultaneous mastopexy is a safe procedure in patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction.