24913 Assessment of Head Shape By Craniofacial Surgeons: Changing Practice Parameters As Volume Increases

Saturday, October 11, 2014: 10:30 AM
Alexandra W Benz, MSN, APN, CPNP , Plastic Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Chad A Purnell, MD , Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
Arun K Gosain, MD , Plastic Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Purpose:  Since the initiation of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ “Back to Sleep” campaign in 1992,the incidence of referrals for positional plagiocephaly has increased by 600%1.  The increased volume of patients makes logistics of separating cases of craniosynostosis from positional plagiocephaly more challenging.  We sought to determine how providers have structured practices to assess and treat the increased workload of head shape abnormality patients.

Materials and Methods: An electronic survey was created and distributed to members of the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons and the American Cleft Palate Association. Practices were categorized by head shape patient volume as low (<4 new patients/month), medium (5-20 new patients/month), and high (>21 new patients/month). A Pearson’s Chi-square test was utilized to determine practice characteristics that differed significantly with practice volume.

Experience:  The survey was distributed to 1322 craniofacial providers.  Response rate was 6.6%, with 88 responses. 

Results:  Results are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Characteristics of different volume practices. p-values with an asterix indicate characteristics that differ significantly as practice size increases.

Small Volume (n=22)

Moderate Volume (n=50)

Large Volume (n=14)

p (2-tailed)

Use of a portable laser scanner (%)

1 (4.5%)

3 (5.9%)

1 (6.7%)

0.959

Use of a stationary laser scanner (%)

1 (4.5%)

5 (9.8%)

5 (33.3%)

0.023*

Use of caliper anthropometrics (%)

6 (27.3%)

17 (33.3%)

7 (46.7%)

0.467

Use of a 2-D camera (%)

9 (40.9%)

13 (25.5%)

3 (20.0%)

0.297

Use of a 3-D camera (%)

0

5 (9.8%)

3 (20.0%)

0.111

Use of plain X-Ray films (%)

0

4 (7.8%)

4 (26.7%)

0.019*

Organization into a dedicated head shape clinic (%)

1 (4.5%)

23 (46.0%)

12 (80.0%)

<0.0005*

Organization into a multidisciplinary clinic (%)

4 (18.2%)

21 (42.0%)

8 (53.3%)

0.064

Utilizing a Nurse Practitioner or Physician Assistant as part of initial assessment (%)

4 (18.2%)

11 (22.0%)

8 (53.3%)

0.032*

Conclusions:  As volume increases, practices are significantly more likely to utilize Nurse Practitioners or Physician Assistants, stationary laser scanners, and plain films, as well as organizing head shape abnormality patients into a dedicated clinic. These findings may help craniofacial practitioners to better organize their clinic so that personnel with adequate training can screen patients appropriately, thereby providing high quality care without providing an unnecessary time constraint on the surgeon.