Saturday, October 11, 2014: 11:05 AM
Melinda A Costa, MD
,
Plastic Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
Kariuki P Murage, MD,
,
Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
Sunil Tholpady, MD, PhD
,
Plastic Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
Robert J Havlik, MD
,
Dept of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Roberto L. Flores, MD
,
Plastic Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
Background:
Prior
studies report a high incidence of airway complications with rates of 23 to 44%
in patients with Robin sequence (RS) following palate repair. None of these studies directly measure
the severity of airway obstruction preoperatively. Our institution utilizes polysomnography (PSG) to assess risk of airway compromise
prior to palatoplasty in these patients. The purpose of this study is to compare
airway complications in Robin sequence to cleft palate only (CPO) using this
screening airway protocol. In
addition, we identify risk factors for airway complications after palatoplasty.
Methods:
A 12-year retrospective review of patients
with Robin sequence undergoing palatoplasty was
performed. Robin sequence patients
were divided into non-operative management (RS-Nonop)
or mandibular distraction osteogenesis (RS-MDO)
subgroups. Patients with Veau I and II CPO
served as matched controls.
Preoperative variables, including comorbidities and apnea hypopnea index
(AHI), were recorded. The primary
outcome was postoperative airway complication, defined as reintubation,
emergency room visit, or hospital admission within 3 months of palatoplasty.
Significant variables for postoperative airway complications were
identified via univariate analysis.
Results:
113
patients met inclusion criteria: 39 (34.5%) CPO, 74 (65.5%) RS, and 34 (30.1%)
RS-MDO. The total airway
complication rate was 7.1%; this was similar between RS (5.8%) and CPO
(7.7%). In isolated Robin sequence,
the reintubation rate was 0%. Significant variables for reintubation for all patients were cardiac anomalies (p=0.046), gastrointestinal anomalies (p=0.04), lower airway anomalies (p=0.02) and syndromic
diagnosis/genetic anomaly (p=0.052).
Conclusions: These data suggest that the incidence of airway
complications after palatoplasty is not affected by
the presence of Robin sequence when using screening PSG. This study, which is the most extensive
of its kind, demonstrates that PSG is a critical tool when determining the
timing of palatoplasty for patients with Robin
sequence. Cardiac,
gastrointestinal, lower airway anomalies, and syndromic
diagnosis/genetic anomalies are associated with postoperative reintubation.
Close postoperative surveillance may be considered in patients with
these risk factors.
