Methods: All patients undergoing reconstruction following primary BCC excision of the nasal alae were recruited through a single institution. Patient demographics, details of resection and reconstruction were recorded. Positive margins were scored using a quadrant-based directionality system. Defect size was classified as large or small stratified by median defect area. Fisher’s exact-tests were performed.
Experience: A total of 124 patients were included (63 male; 61 female). Follow-up time ranged from 0-87 weeks and complications were low (n =14, 11.2%).
Results: Mean age at time of surgery was 67 years (standard deviation 12.7). Most patients required multiple levels for dermatopathological clearance (n=101, 81.5%). Directionality was found to be preferentially positive in the medial-caudal direction (n=22, 18%), medial-cephalad direction (n=13, 11%), and lateral-caudal direction (n=10, 8%). Median defect area was 0.81cm2 (Q1: 0.55-1.5). Defect size significantly influenced reconstructive method (p<0.01). Small defects were commonly treated with secondary intention (n=24, 40%), while larger defects were reconstructed with nasolabial flaps and full thickness skin grafts (n=15, 25% and 22%).
Conclusion: Surgical margins are preferentially positive in the medial-caudal direction in the alar region. A negative margin in Mohs surgery is an acceptable method of ensuring oncological clearance in a sensitive cosmetic area, which historically has had high recurrence rates when treated without Mohs. Reconstruction under local anesthetic is safe and complication rate is low.