30194 The Neighboring Flap Theory: A New Idea for Defect Closure Achieving Both Reducing the Defect and Confirmed Primary Donor Closure

Monday, September 26, 2016: 11:10 AM
Kenta Tanakura, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
Masayuki Sawaizumi, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
Hiroki Miyashita, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
Yukiko Kuramoto, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
Akiko Matsumoto, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
Masataka Shiozaki , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
Tomoyoshi Shibata, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
Tomohiro Imai, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Covering a large defect with minimal donor site morbidity is a challenging task in reconstructive surgery. Recent advances in perforator flaps provides further alternatives. The research for angiosome or perforasome distinguishes the maximum size of each flap. The maximum size with direct donor site closure is determined by its position and has individual variation. The size of flap is, of course, measured from the size of the defect. The flap size tends to be slightly larger than the defect to avoid tension on the flap after suture.

Our new idea, flap elevation from adjacent area, enables making the defect smaller and simple in calculating the largest size of flaps. Preoperatively the perforators for flap around the defect should be detected. The pedicle of the flap should be inside the defect. The ligation test is done on the edge of the defect in the direction of the pedicle, and the maximum distance of these ligation points is the flap breadth. The length is decided as needed.

From April 2012 to February 2016, 8 malignant tumor excision cases were treated with this method. Among them, 3 cases were anterolateral thigh flaps (ALT) or tensor fasciae latae musculocutaneous flap for inguinal to lateral buttocks. 3 cases were anterior chest wall reconstructions by vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) flaps or thoracoacromial perforator flap. 2 cases were latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps (LD) for back. In one of VRAM cases, the 35x15cm size skin paddle was divided into 2 pieces to cover 25x21cm defect. None of the flaps failed. All the donor sites were closed directly.

There are many studies about reduction in the donor site morbidity. To reduce the defect, partial direct closure is useful, but results in big dog ear. Our method enables two advantages by taking the flap from the neighboring area intentionally, because the dog ear is used as flap. If the breadth is less than the defect size, dividing the flap into some pieces is useful especially for LD, VRAM, and ALT.