30421 Liposomal Bupivacaine in Implant Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient Outcomes and Economics

Saturday, September 24, 2016: 1:50 PM
Saba Motakef, MD , Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
Wendy W Wong, MD , Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
David Nguyen, MD , Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
Izabela A. Galdyn, MD , Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
Michael T. Chung, MD , Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
Hahns Y. Kim, MD , Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
Subhas Gupta, MD, CM, PhD, FRCSC, FACS , Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA

Purpose: Post-operative pain management following breast reconstruction presents significant challenges. The mainstay of post-operative pain management remains opioids. Opioids are unfortunately associated with a plethora of complications (1, 2) and the multitude of side effects associated with these drugs has focused interest in alternative modalities. To date, few studies have evaluated a role for liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain management following breast reconstruction.(3) The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of liposomal bupivacaine in postoperative pain control following implant-based breast reconstruction, to evaluate the effect of liposomal bupivacaine on long term postoperative opioid consumption, and to evaluate the effect of liposomal bupivacaine on length of hospital stay.

Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain management following implant based breast reconstruction was performed. This study consisted of two arms of patients undergoing immediate unilateral or bilateral implant based breast reconstruction. Patients in the control arm were treated intra-operatively with injections with 0.25% bupivacaine and epinephrine, with 20 mL delivered into each breast pocket to perform a field block of the breast pocket. Patients in the experimental arm were treated intra-operatively with one 20 mL, 266 mg vial of 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine, with 10 mL delivered to each breast pocket. Pain medications were converted to morphine equivalents to calculate total opioid usage per hospital stay. Length of stay and other direct cost data was collected over the entire post operative period. Basic statistical analyses consisted of a t-test for average length of stay and average opioid consumption with p= 0.05 being utilized to ascertain statistical significance.

Results: Ten patients have been enrolled prior to this interim analysis. Six women were randomized to the control arm and four women were randomized to the experimental arm. On average, women in the control arm had a longer length of stay (46.0 hours) compared to women in the treatment arm (34.6 hours). Total opioid usage per hospital stay was higher for women in the control arm (152.5 mg) compared to women in the experimental arm (131.4 mg). A direct cost differential was measured.

Conclusion: Early interim analysis suggests that liposomal bupivacaine has the potential to reduce opioid consumption, length of stay, and direct costs. Patient recruitment and data collection is ongoing.