35861 Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps in Extremity Reconstruction: Safety of Re-Elevation

Sunday, September 30, 2018: 5:20 PM
Erica Y Xue, MD , Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Farrah C Liu, BS , Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
Paul J Therattil, MD , Plastic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
Haripriya S. Ayyala, MD , Plastic Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
Edward S Lee, MD , Plastic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
Jonathan D Keith, MD , Plastic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ

PURPOSE—Free flap-based extremity reconstruction in the settings of chronic osteomyelitis and acute traumatic wounds can be a complex, multi-staged process that requires elevation of the free flap at each stage. Use of fasciocutaneous flaps is a safe and effect option in this situation, and may actually be preferable to muscle or musculocutaneous flaps despite traditional recommendations. Here the authors present their experience in utilizing fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction of the lower extremity in the settings of chronic osteomyelitis and acute traumatic wounds.

METHODS—A retrospective review of a single-center's experience with lower extremity fasciocutaneous free flap reconstruction in the setting of chronic osteomyelitis and acute traumatic wounds was performed. Patients were identified from the senior surgeon's prospective database. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed with tissue culture as well as corresponding radiographic changes. Charts were reviewed for relevant risk factors, operative details, and outcomes.

RESULTS—Twenty-one patients underwent reconstruction with free anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flaps. Of the fourteen trauma patients, there were seven Gustilo IIIB lower extremity injuries, three open hand or wrist fractures, two degloving injuries of the foot, one crush injury to the foot, and one traumatic hand amputation. Of the seven chronic osteomyelitis patients, the original mechanism of injury leading to chronic osteomyelitis was traumatic bony fracture in five patients and neoplasm excision in two patients. Mean patient age in our series was 44.3 (7 to 80) years. Mean BMI at time of reconstruction was 27.8 kg/m2 (21.5 to 36.5 kg/m2). The average defect size was 270 cm2 (32 cm2 to 525 cm2). The average length of hospital stay was 32 days. Patients required a mean of 3.7 debridements prior to flap reconstruction and a mean of 6.9 surgeries to complete the reconstructive process. The average time from initial debridement to flap was 15.5 days; mean time from flap to final surgery was 122 days. Mean follow-up time period was 10 months. There were two urgent returns to the operating room with two flap losses. Nine flaps were re-elevated 13 times (1 to 4 re-elevations per flap) for flap debulking, draining wound, antibiotic spacer replacement or removal, bone grafting, and ligament or tendon reconstruction; there were no major complications following flap re-elevation.

CONCLUSIONS—Use of fasciocutaneous flaps in lower extremity reconstruction in the settings of chronic osteomyelitis and acute traumatic wounds appears to be safe and effective, even when the flap is subsequently re-elevated during revision surgery. Fasciocutaneous flaps allow for soft tissue coverage and the potential for protective sensation. Despite operating on a Western population with an overweight BMI, it was possible to utilize fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction. The optimal time from the initial injury to flap reconstruction may actually be longer than once thought.