25052 Individualized Risk of Surgical Complications: An Application of the Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment (BRA) Score

Sunday, October 12, 2014: 10:35 AM
John YS Kim, MD , Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
Alexei S Mlodinow, BA , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
Nima Khavanin, BS , Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
Keith M Hume, MA , American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Arlington Heights, IL
Christopher J Simmons, BS , American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Arlington Heights, IL
Robert X Murphy, MD, MS , Division of Plastic Surgery, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA
Michael J Weiss, MPH , Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA
Karol A Gutowski, MD , General and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

Background: Discussion of risk is a central tenet of the dialogue between surgeon and patient. Being able to individualize and quantify risk has been hampered by the lack of robust, multi-institutional databases from which to create appropriate statistical models.   In an effort to integrate evidence-based practice into the discussion of patient risk and better manage patient expectations, risk calculators have been recently developed from large multi-institutional databases.   Focusing on the comprehensive TOPS database, we endeavored to construct a breast reconstruction risk calculator for plastic surgical outcomes. 

Methods: The Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons (TOPS) database from 2008-2011 was queried for patients undergoing breast reconstruction. Demographic variables were noted and binary regression models constructed for the following complications: seroma, dehiscence, surgical site infection (SSI), explantation, flap failure, reoperation, and overall complications. Model performance was assessed via Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) p-value, c-statistic, and Brier score.

Results: Of 11,992 cases, 5,180 met inclusion criteria. Overall complication rates were 16.5%, with rates of 3.9% for seroma, 4.2% for SSI, 5.8% for dehiscence, 3.8% for explantation, 6.8% for flap failure, and 6.3% for reoperation. Individualized risk models were then developed with acceptable goodness-of-fit, accuracy, and internal validity as demonstrated by H-L statistics, brier scores, and optimism-corrected c-statistics, respectively.   Distribution of overall complication risk was broad and asymmetric, as demonstrated by a skewness of 1.41 and kurtosis of 5.36 (0 and 3 respectively for a normal distribution). These models were used to create an open-access online version of the risk calculator, available at www.BRAscore.org/TOPS.

Conclusions: Population-based measures of risk may not accurately reflect risk for many individual patients. Statistical models demonstrated a wide distribution of risk around the mean probability of a given complication (Table 1). In this era of increasing emphasis on evidence-based medicine, we have developed a breast reconstruction risk assessment calculator from the robust TOPS database (Figure 1).   The BRAscore tool can aid in individualizing--and quantifying--risk to better inform surgical decision-making and better manage patient expectations.

Level of Evidence: Risk, II          

Complication

Overall Incidence

Minimum Probability

Maximum Probability

Seroma

3.90%

1.10%

27.97%

SSI

4.20%

1.17%

52.79%

Dehiscence

5.80%

2.17%

45.40%

Flap Failure

6.80%

1.24%

50.57%

Explantation

3.80%

1.14%

52.08%

Reoperation

6.30%

1.82%

24.07%

Overall

16.52%

6.42%

60.39%