25548 Effect of Vacuum-Assisted Closure Performed at the Recipient Site before Fat Grafting

Saturday, October 11, 2014: 10:20 AM
Jung Woo Lee, MD , Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
Yea Sik Han, MD, PhD , Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
Jin Hyung Park, MD, PhD , Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
Sin Rak Kim, MD , Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
Han Kyeol Kim, MD , Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
Hyun Kim, MD, PhD , Department of Anatomy, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

Abstract

Purpose

Fat is widely used in soft tissue augmentation. Nevertheless, fat has an unpredictable, high resorption rate1. Clinically, external expansion with negative pressure is used to increase fat graft survival2. In this study, we performed vacuum-assisted closure(VAC) at the recipient site before fat grafting to test for improvements in vascularity and fat graft survival.

 

Methods

VACs were applied randomly to either the left or right dorsal ear of 20 New Zealand male white rabbits, at a pressure of -125 mmHg. Ears receiving the VAC were assigned to Group 1, and the other ears, the control, were assigned to Group 2. The VAC was removed after one week. The skin flap at each ear was elevated and 1g of fat was grafted above the dorsal perichondrium(Fig. 1). After one week, 10 rabbits were sacrificed, and the fat weight, the vessel density of skin and fat, the amount of glycerol released, which reflects fat viability3 were all measured. The microvessel density was measured with endothelial cell marker CD31, and mature vessel density was measured with smooth muscle actin antibody, both under 200x magnification. Three months after grafting, the remaining 10 rabbits were sacrificed, and the same measurements were taken, exclusive of glycerol release.

Results

Fat weight was not significantly different between groups one week after grafting. Glycerol release in Group 1(183.56±55.1ug/ml/400-mg tissue) was significantly higher than in Group 2(100.32±32.18 ug/ml/400-mg tissue)(P=0.002).

The skin microvessel density measured at one week after grafting, was significantly higher in Group 1(17.3±3.2/HPF) than in Group 2(9.2±2.2/HPF)(P<0.001); the skin mature vessel density was not significantly different between groups. The fat microvessel density was significantly higher in Group 1(4.1±1.2/HPF) than Group 2(2.4±1.0/HPF)(P=0.006); the fat mature vessel density was not significantly different between groups.

The skin microvessel density measured at three months after grafting was significantly higher in Group 1(14.7±3.2/HPF) than in Group 2(9.9±2.0/HPF)(P=0.002).The skin mature vessel density in Group 1(17.7±3.9/HPF) was significantly higher than Group 2 (7.8±1.7/HPF)(P<0.001). The fat microvessel density was not significantly different between groups. The fat mature vessel density of Group 1(2.3±1.0/HPF) was higher than Group 2(0.8±1.0/HPF)(P=0.007). The fat survival rate of Group 1(75.4±3.9%) was higher than Group 2(53.1±4.3%)(P<0.001)(Fig. 2). 

Conclusion

VAC prior to fat grafting increased the vascularity of the recipient site, accordingly enhanced, fat graft survival.

Fig.1.

 

Fig.2.