25818 Enhanced Nerve Regeneration By Minimizing Intraneural Scarring Using a Semi-Permeable Nanofiber Wrap

Saturday, October 11, 2014: 10:40 AM
Karim A Sarhane, MD, MSc , Plastic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
Zuhaib Ibrahim, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Chris Cashman, MD/PhD candidate , Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Russel Martin, PhD candidate , Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Kellin Krick, PhD candidate , Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Sami H Tuffaha, MD , Plastic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
Justin M Broyles, MD , Plastic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
Baohan Pan, MD, PhD , Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Nijaguna Prasad, PhD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Sepehr Tehrani, MD candidate , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Mohammed Alrakan, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Christopher Wallner, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Damon S Cooney, MD, PhD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
Ruifa Mi, MD, PhD , Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Ahmet Höke, M.D., Ph.D. FRCPC , Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
W. P. Andrew Lee, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Hai-Quan Mao, PhD , Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Gerald Brandacher, MD , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Introduction:

Despite great advances in microsurgery, functional outcomes following nerve repair remain suboptimal. Scar formation at the repair site is recognized as a major impediment to regenerating axons that need to cross the injury site. We examined the efficacy of a novel nanofiber nerve wrap in reducing scarring at the repair site to restore nerve continuity, enhance neuro-regeneration, and optimize functional recovery.

Methods:

Nerve wraps comprised of nonwoven electrospun poly (ε-caprolactone) nanofibers with pores smaller than 10 µm and a thickness of 100 µm were synthesized. They were wrapped around the nerve repair site in a sciatic transection/repair model in Thy-1 GFP rats. At 5 weeks, their neuro-protective effects and neuro-regenerative potential were assessed. In addition, at 16 weeks, functional recovery was evaluated.

Results:

At 5 weeks, the nanofiber wraps resulted in significantly decreased collagen deposition (Masson Trichrome) and inflammation/macrophage invasion (co-immunofluorescence staining) at the repair site. Moreover, the number of regenerating axons was significantly increased, and retrograde labeling revealed a trend towards a higher number of regenerated dorsal root ganglion neurons in the presence of nanofiber wraps. Mechanistically, these outcomes were correlated to an up-regulation of the anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) and down-regulation of the pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α). In addition, at 16 weeks, the nerve wrap group showed enhanced functional recovery as demonstrated by electromyography, neuromuscular junction re-innervation, and gastrocnemius muscle weight.

Conclusion:

Our results demonstrate favorable outcomes of a novel semi-permeable electrospun nanofiber nerve wrap in protecting the coaptation site and enhancing axonal regeneration through scar-free nerve repair resulting in optimizing functional recovery.

 

Effect Of a Semi-Permeable Nanofiber Wrap on Nerve Regeneration

Evaluation at 5 weeks

Evaluation at 16 weeks

Regenerated myelinated axons

(counts)

Collagen deposition

(% area)

Macrophage infiltration

(cells/mm2)

qRT-PCR

(fold change)

EMG
(% recovery)

NMJ

(% reinnervation)

Gastroc.

weight

(% atrophy)

Group 1: Sciatic Transection and Repair

8,372 ± 1,691

7.4 ± 1.3

32.2 ± 2.4

Ref.

15.0 ± 4.7

3.1 ± 3.2

69.3 ± 6.0

Group 2: Sciatic Transection and Repair + Nerve Wrap

23,227 ± 4,527*

3.2 ± 1.3*

14.6 ± 1.8*

IL-10: +10

TNF-α:-5

23.2 ± 6.1

13.4  ± 4.7*

54.9 ± 6.9*

Mean ± standard deviation values are shown (n = 4-8).

*p < 0.05 compared with control (Group 1).