Methods: Retrospective case note review of patient demographics, pre and post-operative Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), MAYO scores, range of movement and grip strength, complications and follow-up duration. All complications in follow up were recorded across the 5 year period.
Results: 25 implants on 23 patients over 5 years, mean age 61; 8 females and 15 male. 10 patients with SLAC, 3 SNAC, 5 inflammatory and 7 patients with generalized Osteoarthritis. The patients showed large improvements of MAYO and DASH scores post-operatively, alongside increased in range of movement. There was just one case of implant looseing- the radial screw after a wound infection, which was revised with a longer screw. Two implants were converted to Motec fusion due to pain. One implant was dislocated and relocated. The remaining patients have had good wrist function. Only 6 patients were unable to return to work.
Discussion: Similar to results of Reigstad et al, this series shows the Motec implant to be a good motion preserving alternative to total wrist fusion.