Methods: Thirty-six female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into 3 groups: 1) Control- left sciatic nerve isolation without injury, or 2) Reverse Autograft- 10mm cut left sciatic nerve segment reoriented 180° and used to coapt the proximal and distal ends, or 3) Forward Autograft- 10mm cut nerve segment kept in its normal orientation for coaptation. Animals underwent Sciatic Function Index (SFI) and Foot Fault (FF) behavior studies, at 72 hours, and then weekly. At 6 weeks, axons proximal, within, and distal to the autograft were evaluated using DTI and choline acetyltransferase motor staining for immunohistochemistry (IHC). Bilateral gastrocnemius/soleus muscle weights were compared to obtain a net wet weight to assess the degree of muscle atrophy. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing independent t-test and statistical significance confirmed with Mann-Whitney U test.
Results: DTI findings including fractional anisotropy (FA), radial diffusivity, and axial diffusivity were similar between reverse and forward autografts. Mean motor axon counts proximal/within/distal to the autograft were 2096/1605/906 in the reverse group and 2353/1429/924 in the forward group, which were not statistically significant. Likewise, there was no difference in behavioral studies at any tested time point, or net muscle weight (1.37g vs 1.30g, p=0.14) at 6 weeks.
Conclusion: DTI proves to be a reliable tool to assess peripheral nerve regeneration. It supports that reversing nerve autograft polarity does not influence outcomes. Autograft repairs should therefore be oriented in the direction that allows the best fascicular alignment.